← Search

Victor Betancourt

Lynnwood, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
321 matches · 200W–121L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.94
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
78%
down to 4.0
22%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 52% down · 48% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.00. Higher than today’s 3.94 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lynnwood · 4.5
5 of 6
WA · 4.5
298 of 364

Victor is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Victor has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Victor has gone from the 62nd to the 38th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
85%
17W–3L · 60.4% of games
4.0
73.7%
73W–26L · 59.1% of games
4.5
44.6%
29W–36L · 46.4% of games
6.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 68.3% of games
7.0mixed
66%
31W–16L · 56.6% of games
8.0mixed
65.8%
25W–13L · 56.3% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history321 matches
W
Blake Gettmann / Peter Kosten
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Snyder
+0.041better than expected — took 56% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Winston Liu / Jordan Nishimura
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emmanuel Nguyen
+0.042better than expected — took 55% of games against 39% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Loren Callahan / Steven Dagg
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Snyder
+0.005about as expected — took 47% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
Bronson Shonk / Jeremiah Bayna
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anthony Tran
−0.007below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alex Schulz
−0.012below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Will Blanchard
+0.038better than expected — took 47% of games against 33% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bob Strickland
−0.068below expectation — took 38% of games against 65% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Mark Symington / Dan Holmes
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anthony Tran
−0.044below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Charles Hodge / Mike Wilson
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lohit Verma
+0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Jeffrey Haessler / Dan Eder
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lohit Verma
+0.057better than expected — took 92% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 5-1
L
David Tobar / Chris Heacox
2026-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Flores
−0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Randy Myers
−0.035below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.