← Search

Dan Eder

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
175 matches · 73W–102L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.56
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
23%
down to 3.5
77%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 14% down · 86% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.59. Higher than today’s 3.56 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
145 of 186
WA · 4.0
640 of 782

Dan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dan has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Dan has gone from the 8th to the 42nd percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 51.1% of games
4.0
41.8%
28W–39L · 46.7% of games
4.5
21.1%
4W–15L · 37.6% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 69.7% of games
8.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 53.4% of games
9.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.2% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48% of games
8.0mixed
29.4%
10W–24L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history175 matches
L
Angela Hei / Sean Kellymixed
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sara Addicott
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Chris Bridgeman
+0.052better than expected — took 56% of games against 36% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Doug Conboy / Richard Lozanochamps
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Chris Bridgeman
+0.008about as expected — took 53% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sara Addicott
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Adrian Aditya / Jagbir Singh
2026-03-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wilmot Li
+0.013better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Haessler
−0.057below expectation — took 8% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 5-1
L
Steve Fong / Ravi Ramkumar
2026-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Furman
+0.027better than expected — took 37% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Kevin ODonnell / Clarke Straus
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Haessler
+0.022about as expected — took 29% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Charles Hodge / Matthew Ip
2026-01-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anh Nguyen
+0.003below expectation — took 20% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-11-15 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Audley Becker
−0.024below expectation — took 50% of games against 61% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Bridgeman
−0.037below expectation — took 57% of games against 68% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-08-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melissa Manier
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.