Search

William Snedegar

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
58 matches · 46W–12L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.80
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
1%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
41 of 199
WA · 4.0
164 of 840

William is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

William has been 4.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, William has gone from the 74th to the 83rd percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
100%
8W–0L · 72.6% of games
4.0
68%
17W–8L · 58.8% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 65.7% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
L
Kareem Kamel / Louis Rodgers
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eliot Tong
+0.015better than expected — took 55% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
Carson Reed / Hans Martin Callechamps
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Daniel Song
0.022below expectation — took 37% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Peyton Menti / Mark de Vere Whitechamps
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Tomas San Miguel
0.022below expectation — took 55% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Vietlong Le / Tohma Sugimoto
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tomas San Miguel
+0.022better than expected — took 62% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Dillon Orian / Igor Anisimov
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tomas San Miguel
0.012about as expected — took 58% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tomas San Miguel
+0.032better than expected — took 63% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tomas San Miguel
+0.012better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Agni Herur - (DQ)* / Hyeoncheol Jung
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tomas San Miguel
0.018about as expected — took 56% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tomas San Miguel
0.006about as expected — took 54% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
Chris Bridgeman / Clay Dudley
2026-04-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Song
+0.039better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Squire
0.029below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-12-13 · #3 Doubles · with Ava MOTRONI
+0.005better than expected — took 86% of games against 71% expected
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.