← Search

Jeff Feinstein

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 48W–25L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeff Feinstein to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-05-23 · STC-Noonan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Hipps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · STC-Noonan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Oscar Harding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · STC-Noonan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Hipps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-6
W
2026-02-13 · STC-Hipps/Kosloff · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Duff Bryant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-01-24 · STC-Hipps/Kosloff · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-10-19 · STC-Revere · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karl Crabs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-10-04 · NWW-STC-Ferry · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Rosen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-09-26 · STC-Revere · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bruce Addison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-20 · STC-Revere · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher McReynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-13 · STC-Revere · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John VanNewkirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-03-07 · STC-Bakers Dozen-Hipps · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Kosloff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-02-16 · STC-Bakers Dozen-Hipps · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Blakeslee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
69.2%
27W–12L · 58.3% of games
7.0
66.7%
16W–8L · 59.6% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#1 Singles
19%
14 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer