← Search

Christopher McReynolds

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 40W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christopher McReynolds to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-03-06 · STC-Hipps/Kosloff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Ferry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-01 · STC-Hipps/Kosloff · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-22 · STC-Hipps/Kosloff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Romano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-11-02 · STC-Revere · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2025-10-25 · STC-Revere · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Slade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-19 · STC-Revere · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Fisk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-09-20 · STC-Revere · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Feinstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-02-16 · STC-Bakers Dozen-Hipps · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-01-18 · STC-Bakers Dozen-Hipps · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Oaksmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2024-10-26 · STC-Revere · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Fiebig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-09-08 · STC-Revere · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Fiebig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-02-25 · STC-Bakers Dozen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark de Vere White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
43.9%
18W–23L · 48.7% of games
4.0
17.6%
3W–14L · 35.6% of games
7.0
46.2%
12W–14L · 48.6% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
12 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal