← Search

Kimberly Kocher

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 84W–47L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Kocher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
W
2026-07-28 · Six-Pack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Meyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · Six-Pack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Janson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Six-Pack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Janson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-29 · TCSP-Bursiek · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-16 · Double or Nothing · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-15 · TCSP-Bursiek · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-08 · TCSP-Bursiek · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-01 · TCSP-Bursiek · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-10 · TCSP-Bursiek · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-15 · NTC-Hits Different-Bursiek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Pavelich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-21 · NTC-Hits Different-Bursiek · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-07 · NTC-Hits Different-Bursiek · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 53.6% of games
3.5
80%
40W–10L · 60.6% of games
4.0
25.7%
9W–26L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 41% of the time
#1 Singles
41%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
20 matches
#2 Singles
13%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova