← Search

Carol Nissen

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
51 matches · 15W–36L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.88
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
93%
stay 3.0
7%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.83. Lower than today’s 2.88 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
101 of 144
WA · 3.0
465 of 755

Carol is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Carol has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
20%
5W–20L · 37% of games
7.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 44.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history51 matches
L
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Park
−0.019below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Smallwood
−0.005about as expected — took 55% of games against 55% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricie Hunter
+0.018better than expected — took 47% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Debra Simmonds / Corinna Huffaker
2025-11-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Thomas
+0.017better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Watson
−0.017below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Troutman
−0.029below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Larson
−0.022below expectation — took 14% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Anne Holland / Sharon Lee
2025-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Hasbrook
+0.033better than expected — took 50% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Gaan
−0.037below expectation — took 8% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Dee Ann Belsky / Trisha Hoss
2024-09-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Watson
−0.027below expectation — took 50% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-09-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gina Gentry
−0.012below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2024-09-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherilyn Anderson
−0.025below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.