← Search

KC Mattingly-Nelson

Snohomish, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
169 matches · 122W–47L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add KC Mattingly-Nelson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history169 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Stan Steele championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · HBSQ-Mattingly-Nelson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Max Genereaux mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · HBSQ-Mattingly-Nelson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stan Steele mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-18 · HBSQ-Vana · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Mann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-12 · KC & Jamie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Robbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-11 · HBSQ-Mattingly-Nelson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stan Steele mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-09 · KC & Jamie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Schroeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-05 · KC & Jamie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Schroeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-28 · HBSQ-Mattingly-Nelson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stan Steele mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · HBSQ-Mattingly-Nelson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Casey Bui mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · HBSQ-Vana · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent Gustafson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-15 · KC & Jamie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Schroeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 69.4% of games
3.5
70.8%
51W–21L · 56.9% of games
4.0
40%
4W–6L · 49% of games
7.0mixed
87.2%
34W–5L · 65.1% of games
8.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
25 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal