Search

ANN MOLITOR

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
170 matches · 95W–75L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.20
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.5
68 of 96
WA · 3.5
872 of 1209

ANN is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

ANN has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, ANN has gone from the 33rd to the 16th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
67.7%
42W–20L · 57.9% of games
3.5
40.3%
25W–37L · 45.7% of games
6.0mixed
81.2%
13W–3L · 59.5% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history170 matches
L
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gabby Klingman
0.027below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Sharon Fang / Belle Chen
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Staddon-Smith
+0.042better than expected — took 59% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
KC Mattingly-Nelson / Rebecca Robbins
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Staddon-Smith
+0.018about as expected — took 20% of games against 24% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Sarah Barnes / Lisa Small
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Staddon-Smith
0.035below expectation — took 50% of games against 64% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Melissa Cahoon / Angelisa Paladin
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Staddon-Smith
0.043below expectation — took 14% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Gwendolyn Emminger / Melissa Manier
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gabby Klingman
+0.038better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Becky Jhu / Terriko Somers
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Staddon-Smith
0.029below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Staddon-Smith
0.007below expectation — took 32% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Kathrin Jackson / Kathy Lee
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Staddon-Smith
0.076below expectation — took 8% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Staddon-Smith
+0.001about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Lindsey Holt / Muff Heffernan
2026-04-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Staddon-Smith
+0.022better than expected — took 53% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Barb Moe / Celia Evans
2026-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Staddon-Smith
+0.010about as expected — took 47% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.