← Search

Jennie Cecil-Moore

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
162 matches · 75W–87L · seasons 2020–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 3.5
47 of 63
WA · 3.5
696 of 1209

Jennie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennie has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jennie has gone from the 2nd to the 46th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
69.4%
25W–11L · 60.4% of games
3.5
34.6%
28W–53L · 44.9% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.3% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 60% of games
7.0mixed
51.9%
14W–13L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history162 matches
W
Jamie Schroeder / Rebecca Robbins
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jingjing Cai
+0.056better than expected — took 59% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
ANN MOLITOR / Gabby Klingman
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jingjing Cai
+0.027better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jingjing Cai
+0.007about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Una Lee / Angelisa Paladin
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jingjing Cai
−0.004below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Laura Karassik / Karen Dalton
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol LaMoria
+0.003about as expected — took 65% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Yogita MANGHNANI / Michelle Weijia Cai
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol LaMoria
−0.040below expectation — took 8% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-22 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.043better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-14 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.050better than expected — took 92% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Jill Hancock / Jennifer Johnson
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Reguera
+0.007about as expected — took 48% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol LaMoria
+0.016about as expected — took 37% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol LaMoria
+0.029better than expected — took 41% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Erica Lerer / Sharon Lee
2026-04-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Waid Louie
−0.022below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.