← Search

Alicia Alberg

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
78 matches · 38W–40L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.83
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
146 of 213
WA · 3.0
626 of 960

Alicia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Alicia has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Alicia has gone from the 14th to the 56th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
51.5%
34W–32L · 52.8% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history78 matches
L
Carrie Barrios / Alexis Wood
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Wood
−0.038below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Wood
−0.041below expectation — took 37% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Alison MacBeth / Krista Davis
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Wood
+0.014better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · with Anne Gravrock
−0.011below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Jessica Bratrude / Shannon Robinson
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gena Bettin
−0.036below expectation — took 53% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Ann Trivett / Sarah Larson
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacqueline True
−0.008about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Melissa Bell / Mckenzie Dickson
2026-05-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gena Bettin
−0.013about as expected — took 63% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Denise Braza / Rachel Olson
2026-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Gravrock
−0.017below expectation — took 42% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-04-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Gravrock
−0.002about as expected — took 53% of games against 52% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Mindy Park / Vineet Tiwari
2026-03-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie True
+0.014better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Gravrock
+0.016better than expected — took 57% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Deirdre O'Connor / Christy Srithongsuk
2026-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacqueline True
−0.010about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.