← Search

Rachel Olson

Kirkland, WA
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
23 matches · 14W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Rachel Olson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
W
2026-08-04 · Olson One Doubles · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tish Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · Olson One Doubles · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tish Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-10 · Lauren Leahy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Leahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-23 · Olson One Doubles · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tish Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-22 · Olson One Doubles · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tish Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · BC-Bloch · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey McCallum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-19 · BC-Bloch · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Bloch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-18 · BC-Rozanski · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Margaret Pak Enslow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-05-12 · BC-Bloch · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey McCallum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-29 · BC-Bloch · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Braza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-04-27 · BC-Rozanski · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-23 · Olson · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
60%
6W–4L · 57.8% of games
3.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.1% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 44% of the time
#1 Singles
44%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova