Teams

Lauren Leahy

2026 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesCamille Elliott / Linda Cowin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-21vs Chan BusbyLost 01
L#1 DoublesCamille Elliott / Linda Cowin vs Namchee Chan / Jennifer Heydt1-6, 6-7
2026-07-14vs Matchpoint.Leny'sLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Leahy / Camille Elliott vs Anna Karlin / Ge Li4-6, 1-6
2026-07-10vs Swing VolleysWon 10
W#1 DoublesLauren Leahy / Rachel Olson vs Aki Tameling / Mona Elsing6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Rachel Olson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.11
Camille Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Linda Cowin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.81
Lauren Leahy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Leahy + Camille Elliott11037% games−3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Rachel Olson
14W–9L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.13
3.5
Camille Elliott
62W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Linda Cowin
44W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
3
Lauren Leahy
53W–100L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.