Search

Camille Elliott

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
126 matches · 62W–64L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.04
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
29%
down to 3.0
71%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 17% down · 83% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.08. Higher than today’s 3.04 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
301 of 311
WA · 3.5
1311 of 1364

Camille is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Camille has played at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.02.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Camille has gone from the 80th to the 51st percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
2.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 43.9% of games
3.0
58.9%
33W–23L · 58% of games
3.5
26.3%
5W–14L · 43.4% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 33.7% of games
6.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 66.8% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0%
0W–6L · 34.3% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history126 matches
W
N/A
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Cowin
0.013better than expected — took 100% of games against 88% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Cowin
0.019below expectation — took 35% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Leahy
0.007below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Lisa Hagan / Mary Turner
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Leahy
+0.055better than expected — took 67% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Leahy
+0.011about as expected — took 40% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Leahy
+0.018about as expected — took 37% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adina Friedman
0.037below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Edith Laird
2026-04-07 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.042below expectation — took 47% of games against 62% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.028below expectation — took 32% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-03-20 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.018below expectation — took 8% of games against 15% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Cheryl Escobido / Lori Harris
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lauren Leahy
0.029below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Erica Wiechers / Kitrina Bryant
2025-09-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Atkinson
0.018below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.