← Search

Camille Elliott

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 62W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Camille Elliott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
W
N/A
2026-07-27 · Lauren Leahy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Cowin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-21 · Lauren Leahy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Cowin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-14 · Lauren Leahy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Leahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-28 · BC-Court Jesters-Staddon/Smith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Leahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-07 · BC-Court Jesters-Staddon/Smith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Leahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-16 · BC-Court Jesters-Staddon/Smith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Leahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-09 · BC-Court Jesters-Staddon/Smith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adina Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-07 · Elliott · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-26 · Elliott 4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-03-20 · Elliott 4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-12 · BC-Leahy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lauren Leahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-20 · BC-Leahy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Atkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 43.9% of games
3.0
58.6%
34W–24L · 57.7% of games
3.5
25%
5W–15L · 42.1% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 65.9% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0%
0W–6L · 34.3% of games
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 59.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#1 Singles
10%
13 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams