Search

Susanna Wilken

Issaquah, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
162 matches · 85W–77L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.89
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
92%
stay 3.0
8%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.83. Lower than today’s 2.89 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Issaquah · 3.0
9 of 13
WA · 3.0
455 of 755

Susanna is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Susanna has been a steady 3.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Susanna has gone from the 50th to the 26th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
54.2%
39W–33L · 50.8% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 51.7% of games
6.0
70.6%
24W–10L · 54.7% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.3% of games
7.0mixed
25%
6W–18L · 38.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history162 matches
L
Rachel Olson / Tish Brown
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Oroszlan
0.053below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Oroszlan
+0.042better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lance Wilken
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Stephanie Artati / Stuart Childress
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Oroszlan
0.007about as expected — took 45% of games against 48% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Katie Misiewicz / Alexa Helsell McIntyre
2026-06-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Oroszlan
+0.033better than expected — took 33% of games against 27% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Mei Ling Schenker / Meng Yang
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Oroszlan
0.013below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Oroszlan
+0.009about as expected — took 40% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L
Annika Andrews / Louise Farrell
2026-04-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Oroszlan
0.013below expectation — took 32% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
Hillary Higgins / Carrie Barrios
2026-03-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Juiling Edmonds
0.014about as expected — took 50% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Kristy Charles / Michele Rasmussen
2026-02-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Taylor
0.003about as expected — took 54% of games against 56% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Amy Olason / Brittany Robinett
2026-02-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Taylor
+0.003better than expected — took 68% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Margaret Steck / Catherine Maxson
2025-11-07 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dana Laursen
+0.010better than expected — took 52% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.