Search

Deborah Oroszlan

Kirkland, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
74 matches · 23W–51L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.81
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 3.0
25 of 31
WA · 3.0
572 of 755

Deborah is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Deborah has been a steady 3.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

2.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Deborah has gone from the 34th to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
35.3%
18W–33L · 44.3% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 31.9% of games
6.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.6% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history74 matches
L
Rachel Olson / Tish Brown
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susanna Wilken
0.053below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susanna Wilken
+0.042better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Stephanie Artati / Stuart Childress
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susanna Wilken
0.007about as expected — took 45% of games against 48% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Katie Misiewicz / Alexa Helsell McIntyre
2026-06-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susanna Wilken
+0.033better than expected — took 33% of games against 27% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Mei Ling Schenker / Meng Yang
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susanna Wilken
0.013below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Jane Stonecipher / Meredith Helmick
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rose Smith
0.019below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susanna Wilken
+0.009about as expected — took 40% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L
Annika Andrews / Louise Farrell
2026-04-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susanna Wilken
0.013below expectation — took 32% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Jiang
+0.027better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Catherine Maxson / Jenny Sanders
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Jiang
+0.004about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Greenlaw
+0.044better than expected — took 48% of games against 32% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Andrea Lang / Amanda Weaver
2026-02-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynda Carlson
+0.016below expectation — took 14% of games against 21% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.