Search

Rose Smith

Kirkland, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
92 matches · 43W–49L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.69
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 3.0
26 of 31
WA · 3.0
696 of 755

Rose is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rose has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Rose has gone from the 58th to the 15th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
50%
8W–8L · 53.8% of games
3.0
39%
16W–25L · 44.7% of games
6.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history92 matches
W
John Haines / Missi Huffmixed
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Clellie Dobbs
+0.000better than expected — took 55% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
arvind Mallikarjunan / Teresa Kingmixed
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eric Baird
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Tammi Tompkins / Lucio Tiberimixed
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Shen
+0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Sylvia Ohm / Mamta Pandey
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Jiang
+0.042better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Jane Stonecipher / Meredith Helmick
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Oroszlan
0.019below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Taylor
0.008below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Karen Dalton / Lorraine Whelan
2026-03-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Vona
+0.023better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Melissa Bode / Cheryl Wate
2026-02-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Taylor
+0.000about as expected — took 32% of games against 36% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
Anna Bonnett / Shannon Hull
2026-01-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Taylor
0.040below expectation — took 33% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonathan Smith
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 41% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Gemma Gimpes / Dinesh Mandalapumixed
2025-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonathan Smith
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Michele Rasmussen / Carol Guattare
2025-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Cocales
0.026below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.