← Search

Missi Huff

Edmonds, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 20W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Missi Huff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-08-08 · HBSQ-Team #1-A Jamison-Huff · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Haines mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-02 · HBSQ-Team #1-A Jamison-Huff · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Aaron Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-25 · HBSQ-Team #1-A Jamison-Huff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Haines mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-05 · HBSQ-Team #1-A-Huff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sanjay Chopra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-03 · HBSQ-Team #1-A Jamison-Huff · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Haines mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-21 · HBSQ-Team #1-A-Huff · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sanjay Chopra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · HBSQ-Swing Sisters-Matysik · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Matysik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-21 · HBSQ-Swing Sisters-Matysik · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Liner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-15 · HBSQ-Swing Sisters-Matysik · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Liner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-02-01 · HBSQ-Swing Sisters-Matysik · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Matysik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-01-02 · HBSQ-Swing Sisters-Matysik · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Swingle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-15 · HBSQ-Harbor Square Team #1-A-Huff · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Haines mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 54% of games
3.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 46% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 51.7% of games
6.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 44.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#1 Singles
13%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova