Search

Teresa Engrav

Seattle, WA
3.0A year-end 2025
124 matches · 57W–67L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.88
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
93%
stay 3.0
7%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.83. Lower than today’s 2.88 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
128 of 213
WA · 3.0
539 of 960

Teresa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Teresa has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Teresa has gone from the 19th to the 41st percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
68.6%
24W–11L · 56.5% of games
3.0
40%
20W–30L · 46.4% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.8% of games
6.0mixed
29.2%
7W–17L · 42.4% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 36.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history124 matches
L
Christa Lum / Sarah Smith
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annabella Chiocco
+0.042better than expected — took 50% of games against 34% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patrick Garland
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Sallie Ragsdale / Amy Bryant
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annabella Chiocco
0.058below expectation — took 25% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Jennifer Rogers / Angie Kennedy
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annabella Chiocco
0.014about as expected — took 56% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 4-4
W
Irina Petriuc / Ioana Ungureanasu
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annabella Chiocco
+0.033better than expected — took 75% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Susan Williams / Carolyn Bardon
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jillayna Campos
0.014below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Missi Huff / Sanjay Chopramixed
2026-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patrick Garland
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Allan Yeung / Tingting Zhengmixed
2026-07-03 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rizwan Ahmed
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Roger Hackett / Qinjia Hackettmixed
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nick Cilluffo
+0.000better than expected — took 61% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Ryan Buma / Jennifer Bumamixed
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Barbano
+0.000better than expected — took 56% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Celeste Garcia Ramberg / Madzy Besselaar
2026-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Williams
+0.012better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Jenny Sorensen / Vineet Tiwari
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Kane
0.014about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.