← Search

Sarah Smith

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 45W–16L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Sarah Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
W
2026-08-18 · Sarah · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-11 · Kiss My Ace-Choder · #1 Female Singles · 0.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0
W
2026-08-05 · 4 Pack · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christa Lum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · Kiss My Ace-Choder · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Meagan Milca mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1
W
2026-07-25 · 4 Pack · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christa Lum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Kiss My Ace-Choder · #1 Female Singles · 0.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2
W
2026-07-20 · 4 Pack · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christa Lum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · Kiss My Ace-Choder · #1 Female Singles · 0.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0
W
2026-07-07 · Kiss My Ace-Choder · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Shweta Omkaram mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4
W
2026-06-30 · 4 Pack · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christa Lum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · with Christa Lum championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · ETC-Split Step-Opekunova · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christa Lum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
84%
21W–4L · 65.5% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 68.9% of games
3.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 69.9% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 55% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#1 Female Doubles
20%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#1 Female Singles
10%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer