Teams

AYTC-Sharma

2026 Coed 18-39 · 3.0 Coed

9 players · average NTRP 2.89 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-14vs CAC/SL-Net Results-StiebritzWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesCynthia Wang vs Rebecca Yuen6-4
2026-03-08vs BTA-My Backhand Sucks-LauWon 40
W#1 Female DoublesSarah Smith / Elizabeth Peijnenburg vs Jessmin Lau / Xinbei Gong6-3
W#1 Female SinglesJemimah Kim vs Xinbei Gong6-2
W#1 Male DoublesPrateek Sharma / Kurt Nikaitani vs Jonathan Wang / Zhentao Lin6-4
W#1 Male SinglesPrateek Sharma vs Jonathan Wang4-4
2026-02-27vs RTC-Hits and Giggles-MundtLost 13
W#1 Female DoublesJemimah Kim / Cynthia Wang vs Sarah Huang / Liling Yuan6-5
L#1 Female SinglesJemimah Kim vs Saung Mundt3-5
L#1 Male DoublesPrateek Sharma / Kurt Nikaitani vs Phillip Pham / Georgy Gorelko2-6
L#1 Male SinglesKurt Nikaitani vs Andy Wang2-6
2026-02-07vs WSC-Racket Scientists-UngureanasuWon 20
W#1 Female SinglesCynthia Wang vs Roxana Rautu6-1
W#1 Mixed DoublesPrateek Sharma / Cynthia Wang vs Paul Druta / Bianca Druta4-2
2026-02-01vs ETC-Serve-vivors-ZhangLost 13
W#1 Female DoublesSarah Smith / Cynthia Wang vs Xin Sun / Lizzy Feng6-3
L#1 Female SinglesCynthia Wang vs Huixin Lai0-6
L#1 Male DoublesBhaumik Jain / Kurt Nikaitani vs Jason Bak / Shawn Zhang3-6
L#1 Male SinglesPaulo Mesaros vs Jason Bak2-6
2026-01-24vs FC-Big Cats-BodineWon 50
W#1 Female DoublesCynthia Wang / Akoly Vongdala vs Sierra Bartruff / Qiushan Li6-2
W#1 Female SinglesSarah Smith vs Jiayi Lin6-0
W#1 Male DoublesArjun Singh / Paulo Mesaros vs Xin Huang / Hongyu Zhu6-3
W#1 Mixed DoublesKurt Nikaitani / Sarah Smith vs Brittney Davis / Xin Huang3-3
W#2 Mixed DoublesPrateek Sharma / Cynthia Wang vs Mingyi He / Hongyu Zhu5-2
2026-01-02vs AYTC-NocomWon 31
W#1 Female DoublesCynthia Wang / Jemimah Kim vs Bethany Haddad / Amanda Huynh6-3
L#1 Female SinglesCynthia Wang vs Bethany Haddad4-6
W#1 Male DoublesPrateek Sharma / Kurt Nikaitani vs Brian Quach / Etzael Garcia5-2
W#1 Male SinglesPrateek Sharma vs Bao Vu6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Coed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Sarah Smith
usually #1 Female Doubles 60%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 20% · published 3
2.95
Cynthia Wang
usually #1 Female Singles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Jemimah Kim
usually #1 Female Singles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Arjun Singh
published 3
2.70
Kurt Nikaitani
usually #1 Male Doubles 43%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 43% · published 3
2.68
Bhaumik Jain
published 3
2.54
Prateek Sharma
usually #1 Male Singles 40%, also #2 Mixed Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.51
2.18
Paulo Mesaros
usually #1 Male Doubles 50%, also #1 Male Singles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kurt Nikaitani + Prateek Sharma314 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Smith + Kurt Nikaitani303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sarah Smith
46W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Cynthia Wang
29W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Jemimah Kim
14W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Arjun Singh
3W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Kurt Nikaitani
46W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Bhaumik Jain
3W–11L career · no lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
2.5
Prateek Sharma
11W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%37%63%
2.54
3
Elizabeth Peijnenburg
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
2.5
Paulo Mesaros
15W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.