Search

Ellen Jones

Seattle, WA
3.0A year-end 2025
128 matches · 41W–87L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.48
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
62%
down to 2.5
38%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 38% down · 62% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.52. Higher than today’s 2.48 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
144 of 144
WA · 3.0
754 of 755

Ellen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ellen has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Ellen has gone from the 4th to the 2nd percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
50%
8W–8L · 46.3% of games
3.0
21.2%
14W–52L · 36.2% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.4% of games
6.0mixed
41.4%
12W–17L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history128 matches
L
Brook Koski / Jonathan Rhimmixed
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Ford
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Scott Shapiro / Letitia Selkmixed
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Keith Jerome
+0.000better than expected — took 56% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Tami DeVita / Jim Healemixed
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Randy Woo
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Kirkland
+0.038better than expected — took 47% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Sasha Tanji / Yuchen Zhang
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Hoogs
0.026below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Sonya Elliott / Julie Park
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dawn Spratley
0.038below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Connie Elim / Wen Cui
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Vincent
+0.011about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Kristin Wilson / Annelies Smith
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Warren
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Lisa Mohanty / Tanya Rizzo
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Lusty
+0.036better than expected — took 56% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
Missi Huff / Anna Matysik
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzan Mazor
0.043below expectation — took 8% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzan Mazor
0.015below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Catherine Maxson / Mimi Cook
2026-01-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Hoogs
0.030below expectation — took 8% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.