Search

Tanya Rizzo

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
68 matches · 22W–46L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.84
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
97%
stay 3.0
3%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
59 of 104
WA · 3.0
665 of 1107

Tanya is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tanya has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Tanya has gone from the 7th to the 15th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 34.6% of games
2.5
45%
9W–11L · 51.7% of games
3.0
25%
7W–21L · 45.1% of games
6.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history68 matches
L
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Mohanty
0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Elisse Priskila / Jackie Fuller
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with MARGARET MIODUSZEWSKI
+0.016about as expected — took 33% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Amy Enns-Ford / Kirsty Ausmeier
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy King
+0.058better than expected — took 57% of games against 35% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Mohanty
0.047below expectation — took 44% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
Gayle Burlinson / Christina Nelson
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Costello
0.009about as expected — took 44% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-02-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Asha DSouza
0.009below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Cynthia Axtman / Tracy Brodahl
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Mohanty
+0.007about as expected — took 35% of games against 36% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Kerry Shallcross / Kurt Nikaitanimixed
2025-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Hasbrook
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Allen Zhou / Hongjuan Zhangmixed
2025-10-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Malcom Schiltz
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 48% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Proshat Parsimoghadam / Calin Voichitamixed
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Hasbrook
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Xiaoyi Ye / Miaomiao Zhang
2025-08-13 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Michelle Ho
+0.030better than expected — took 60% of games against 46% expected
6-4
L
2025-08-09 · #1 Singles
0.020below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.