← Search

Martha Evatt

Kirkland, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
38 matches · 10W–28L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.71
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 3.0
52 of 62
WA · 3.0
967 of 1107

Martha is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Martha has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Martha has gone from the 29th to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 42.5% of games
6.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 51.2% of games
7.0
0%
0W–5L · 26.8% of games
6.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 33.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history38 matches
L
2026-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Harris
+0.012about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Lee Darrow / Michiyo Killeen
2026-05-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Smith
−0.072below expectation — took 20% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Karen Dunlop / Michelle Jordan
2026-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Egge
+0.019about as expected — took 29% of games against 30% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phyllis Gill
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-3
L
Donna Dornes / Dana Landry
2025-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Egge
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-02-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Iverson
−0.006about as expected — took 38% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-01-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Iverson
+0.008about as expected — took 43% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-01-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hiroko Young
−0.073below expectation — took 8% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2024-01-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hiroko Young
+0.010better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Rachel Wallach / Xin Huangmixed
2023-12-02 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ed Evatt
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-11-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Otterholt
+0.016better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2023-09-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Milter
+0.017about as expected — took 37% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.