← Search

Debra Egge

BELLEVUE, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
107 matches · 35W–72L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.03
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
36%
stay 3.0
64%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 78% stay · 22% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.94. Lower than today’s 3.03 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
195 of 755

Debra is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Debra has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Debra has gone from the 29th to the 30th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.9% of games
3.5
25%
10W–30L · 38.2% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
44.7%
17W–21L · 50.3% of games
8.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.8% of games
7.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 38.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history107 matches
W
Kathe Brissey / Roberta Yaffa
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jude Neldam
−0.005better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Laura Arrigoni / Mary Monroe
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Terry Yuan
+0.009about as expected — took 60% of games against 55% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Susan Bussell / Frances Costigan
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lori Nelson
+0.002better than expected — took 80% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Harris
+0.055better than expected — took 100% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Terry
+0.032better than expected — took 44% of games against 34% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Powers
−0.018below expectation — took 38% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Karen Dunlop / Michelle Jordan
2026-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martha Evatt
−0.004below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Helen Wang / Ge Wang
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Anderson
+0.065better than expected — took 63% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Hongjuan Zhang / Emily Cho
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyoungbin Kim
−0.007about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-03-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rose Marie Gai
+0.069better than expected — took 100% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marla Vasilatos
+0.026about as expected — took 29% of games against 27% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Melissa Bell / Catherine Cline
2026-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rose Marie Gai
−0.041below expectation — took 41% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.