← Search

Cheryl Terry

Kirkland, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 18W–18L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Cheryl Terry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-09-12 · WSC-Cobb · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Escobido
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-10 · WSC-Smith · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Sodorff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-03 · WSC-Smith · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Egge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-26 · WSC-Smith · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-19 · WSC-Smith · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-06 · WSC-Smith · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-31 · WSC-Woodinville Wonder Women-Gai · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammi Tompkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-30 · WSC (Daytime) Team GRIT-Vasilatos · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Dardzinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-3
L
2026-01-24 · WSC-Woodinville Wonder Women-Gai · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-19 · WSC (Daytime) Team GRIT-Vasilatos · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Dardzinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-01-10 · WSC-Woodinville Wonder Women-Gai · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Egge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-11-09 · RTC-Tennis Mavens-Simmonds · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Hayward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
56%
14W–11L · 47.9% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova