Search

Margaret Cobb

Woodinville, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
86 matches · 24W–62L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.94
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
76%
stay 3.0
24%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 94% stay · 6% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.87. Lower than today’s 2.94 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Woodinville · 3.0
7 of 14
WA · 3.0
356 of 755

Margaret is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Margaret has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Margaret has gone from the 43rd to the 5th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 50% of games
3.5
18.6%
8W–35L · 36.9% of games
7.0
23.3%
7W–23L · 42% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-05-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Terry
0.010below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Terry
0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
TERRIE LUQUETTE / Julie Dorr
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Harris
0.026below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Terry
+0.024better than expected — took 52% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
Christy Chang / Lisa C
2026-03-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Dardzinski
0.036below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Elisha Logue / Iuliana Marinov
2026-02-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liesel Schilperoort
+0.004better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Catherine Cline / Meng Yang
2026-02-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzanne Monson
0.030below expectation — took 56% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 4-6
W
Hiroko Young / Alicia Arsene
2026-02-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Anderson
0.031below expectation — took 50% of games against 63% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Eden Goldbloom / Anne Drammeh
2026-01-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Anderson
+0.029better than expected — took 62% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lauren Anderson
+0.032better than expected — took 43% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Sodorff
+0.014better than expected — took 45% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Burdyshaw
+0.036better than expected — took 55% of games against 38% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.