← Search

Lauren Anderson

Kirkland, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
81 matches · 29W–52L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.98
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
61%
stay 3.0
39%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 89% stay · 11% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.90. Lower than today’s 2.98 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 3.0
15 of 31
WA · 3.0
288 of 755

Lauren is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lauren has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Lauren has gone from the 24th to the 18th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 47.6% of games
3.5
25.6%
10W–29L · 42% of games
7.0
40%
10W–15L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history81 matches
W
Jerry Kim / Erina Sugai
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leigha Grimaldi
−0.012below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Meng Yang / Qiwen Hu
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leigha Grimaldi
−0.014below expectation — took 42% of games against 51% expected
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Natalie Banks-Mendez / Gabby Klingman
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leigha Grimaldi
+0.009about as expected — took 47% of games against 43% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Kristy Charles / Carol Guattare
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leigha Grimaldi
+0.047better than expected — took 59% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Harris
−0.071below expectation — took 20% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Harris
+0.010about as expected — took 37% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Helen Wang / Ge Wang
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Egge
+0.065better than expected — took 63% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Cathy Wong / Ying-Chen Liu
2026-03-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Dardzinski
−0.023below expectation — took 43% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
Anuradha Nandagiri / Wai Man Cheng
2026-02-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Dardzinski
+0.015better than expected — took 65% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Hiroko Young / Alicia Arsene
2026-02-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Cobb
−0.031below expectation — took 50% of games against 63% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Becky Hutt / Karen Walker
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Monson
+0.051better than expected — took 67% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Egge
+0.023about as expected — took 29% of games against 28% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.