← Search

Mary Monroe

Edmonds, WA
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
26 matches · 15W–11L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Monroe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
L
2026-07-09 · HBSQ-Vitcovich · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Laura Arrigoni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2023-07-21 · HBSQ-Vitcovich · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Fran Joy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2023-07-16 · HBSQ-Vitcovich · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sara Kuhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2023-07-09 · HBSQ-Vitcovich · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lee Darrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-09 · HBSQ-Rea · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberly Dirksen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2022-09-17 · #2 Doubles · with Vicki Clark championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2022-09-16 · #3 Doubles · with Vicki Clark championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2022-07-13 · FC-Daniels · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Mary Heller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2022-07-07 · FC-Daniels · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Fran Joy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2022-05-18 · HBSQ-Clark · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Daniels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2022-05-13 · HBSQ-Rea · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sara Kuhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2022-04-25 · HBSQ-Rea · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Daniels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.2% of games
7.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 54% of games
8.0
20%
1W–4L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer