← Search

Janice Ferrera

Kent, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
63 matches · 26W–37L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.18
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kent · 3.5
9 of 13
WA · 3.5
924 of 1209

Janice is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Janice has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Janice has gone from the 54th to the 71st percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 45% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 37.9% of games
7.0
63.3%
19W–11L · 55.6% of games
8.0
20%
2W–8L · 41.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Lockett
+0.023better than expected — took 57% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Lockett
+0.023better than expected — took 46% of games against 37% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Nomi
+0.001about as expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Janet Bell / Deirdre Chiu
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nona Allison
+0.020better than expected — took 68% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nona Allison
+0.053better than expected — took 67% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-13 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Lockett
−0.019about as expected — took 63% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Sarah Yoon / Xue Song
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacia Servos
−0.014below expectation — took 32% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Christine Acker / Wenjing Yin
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Beckman
−0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-01-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vivian Nagai
−0.027below expectation — took 43% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-10-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melissa Beckman
−0.012below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Heidi Relyea / Rebecca LAUGHLIN
2025-09-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chantal Tran
+0.046better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-09-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sigrid Achtmann
+0.027better than expected — took 53% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.