Search

Margaret Nomi

Issaquah, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
100 matches · 62W–38L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.19
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Issaquah · 3.5
18 of 21
WA · 3.5
893 of 1209

Margaret is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Margaret has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.0201920202021202220232025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Margaret has gone from the 74th to the 23rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.3% of games
4.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.3% of games
7.0
69.5%
41W–18L · 56.4% of games
8.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 44.9% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Yorozu
0.018below expectation — took 32% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janice Ferrera
+0.001about as expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with MARILYN PORTER
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Jodi Dansereau / Judy Simmons
2026-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roann Milligan
0.013below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roann Milligan
0.043below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2025-11-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Trucmai Tran
+0.009better than expected — took 53% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Trucmai Tran
+0.004about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roann Milligan
0.041below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with MARILYN PORTER
+0.049better than expected — took 53% of games against 33% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Euting
0.012about as expected — took 58% of games against 61% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Nan Myers / Julie Fretwell
2025-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Euting
+0.035better than expected — took 75% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruthann Nelson
0.019below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.