Search

Pamela Yorozu

Seatac, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
59 matches · 26W–33L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.22
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.5
811 of 1209

Pamela is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Pamela has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.520192020202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Pamela has gone from the 41st to the 44th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 49% of games
7.0
51.3%
20W–19L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Nomi
0.018below expectation — took 32% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Euting
+0.010about as expected — took 45% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Williams
+0.024better than expected — took 48% of games against 38% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Williams
0.046below expectation — took 63% of games against 75% expected
6-2, 6-5
W
2025-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nona Allison
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nona Allison
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Williams
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Nomi
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with GAIL JENKINS
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-1
W
Mary van Zyl / Sharon Farrell
2024-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with GAIL JENKINS
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with GAIL JENKINS
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-2
L
Donna Parsons / Valaurie Caprezchamps
2024-09-14 · #1 Doubles · with GAIL JENKINS
0.048below expectation — took 0% of games against 34% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.