← Search

Valarie Kaye

Mercer Island, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
168 matches · 97W–71L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.82
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 3.0
8 of 9
WA · 3.0
556 of 755

Valarie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Valarie has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Valarie has gone from the 70th to the 23rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 50% of games
3.0
66.7%
28W–14L · 53.8% of games
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 46.9% of games
6.0
67.7%
21W–10L · 57% of games
7.0
47.7%
21W–23L · 48.3% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 57.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history168 matches
W
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Arnold
−0.020below expectation — took 60% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Catherine Maxson / Emily Kane
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Relyea
−0.072below expectation — took 8% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Roehrs
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 52% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Rasanen
+0.015about as expected — took 43% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tina Richards
−0.006about as expected — took 57% of games against 59% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Mate
+0.131better than expected — took 86% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Rasanen
+0.020better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Lisa Kerslake / Amy Taylor
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Jordt
−0.032below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Karen Williams / Pamela Yorozu
2026-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Rogers
+0.046better than expected — took 37% of games against 25% expected
6-2, 6-5
L
2026-04-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Conley
−0.029below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Arnold
+0.003below expectation — took 14% of games against 26% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Meng Yang / Mei Ling Schenker
2026-03-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Rasanen
−0.059below expectation — took 25% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.