← Search

Joyce Tierney

Edmonds, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 63W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joyce Tierney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-08-14 · HBSQ-Thompson · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Susan Fyall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · HBSQ-Thompson · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Susan Fyall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-07-03 · HBSQ-Thompson · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Susan Fyall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-28 · HBSQ-Tierney · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carrie Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · HBSQ-Tierney · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Darla Schlumberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-20 · HBSQ-Tierney · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carrie Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-17 · HBSQ-Tierney · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colleen Tracy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-08 · HBSQ-Thompson · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Carrie Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-07-25 · HBSQ-Thompson · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Nancy Burdyshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-07-18 · HBSQ-Thompson · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sheilah Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-06-27 · HBSQ-Thompson · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Diane Wah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-05 · HBSQ-Tierney · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Fyall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 54.3% of games
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
60.7%
34W–22L · 55.1% of games
7.0
40%
8W–12L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams