Search

Rosemary Curran

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
109 matches · 51W–58L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.93
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
81%
stay 3.0
19%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 96% stay · 4% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.86. Lower than today’s 2.93 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
85 of 144
WA · 3.0
375 of 755

Rosemary is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rosemary has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Rosemary has gone from the 96th to the 84th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
21.1%
8W–30L · 39.5% of games
6.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 64.3% of games
7.0
51.2%
22W–21L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history109 matches
W
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathleen Summers
+0.049better than expected — took 86% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Lou
+0.031better than expected — took 53% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Telsin Brower
+0.015better than expected — took 56% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Telsin Brower
+0.025better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Telsin Brower
+0.010better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Cardinal
+0.032better than expected — took 53% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Robbin Northrop / Cynthia Pawlarczykchamps
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · with Telsin Brower
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-6, 6-2
L
Janet Phelps / Nancy Swickchamps
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · with Lesley Burvill Holmes
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-4
W
Erika McCormick / Carmen Rousseauchamps
2026-01-30 · #1 Doubles · with Telsin Brower
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-0
L
Reese Cowan Stewart / Deb Holbrook
2026-01-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathleen Summers
0.044below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-11-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Telsin Brower
0.012about as expected — took 60% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-5
L
Celia Evans / Lynne Parrott
2025-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Telsin Brower
0.027below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.