← Search

Andrea Snyder

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
90 matches · 44W–46L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Andrea sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Andrea is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Andrea has been 3.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Andrea has gone from the 5th to the 12th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
38%
19W–31L · 44.7% of games
7.0
64.5%
20W–11L · 52.1% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 32.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history90 matches
W
Shelley Morrison / Dena Mulberg
2025-10-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Landry
+0.020better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-09-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Landry
−0.017below expectation — took 48% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-12 · #2 Doubles · with Dana Landry
+0.009about as expected — took 55% of games against 51% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Marcie Price / Victoria Rigbychamps
2025-09-11 · #3 Doubles · with Susan Sacks
+0.004about as expected — took 48% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
Mary Aquino / Barbara Cottonchamps
2025-06-17 · #2 Doubles · with Dana Landry
+0.024better than expected — took 86% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-06-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Sacks
+0.014better than expected — took 56% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Sacks
+0.008about as expected — took 59% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Sacks
−0.049below expectation — took 47% of games against 67% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Elena Harnish
2025-05-29 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.038below expectation — took 40% of games against 57% expected
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allyson Jackson
+0.002about as expected — took 45% of games against 47% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Rose Marie Gai / Suzanne Monson
2025-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Perkins
−0.029below expectation — took 47% of games against 58% expected
5-7, 5-2
W
2025-04-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Landry
−0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.