← Search

Mary Aquino

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
ISSAQUAH, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 3W–8L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history11 matches
L
2026-06-11 · BETC-Boomer Rangs-Blegen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aiko Tamiya
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-28 · BETC-Boomer Rangs-Blegen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joan Harkins
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-17 · BETC-Boomer-Rangs-Blegen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Cotton championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-21 · BETC-Boomer-Rangs-Blegen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aiko Tamiya
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-12 · BETC-Boomer-Rangs-Blegen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Goodenberger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-04-28 · BETC-Boomer-Rangs-Blegen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Cotton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
L
2022-04-08 · BETC-Racketeers-Jenkins · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Cotton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2021-06-16 · BETC-Cruzer’s Bruzers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruthann Nelson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
L
2021-05-27 · BETC-Cruzer’s Bruzers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Hollar
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W
2021-05-14 · BETC-Cruzer’s Bruzers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruthann Nelson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-6
L
2019-04-22 · BETC-Cruzat · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Girias
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
46%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe