← Search

Barbara Kristek

SHORELINE, WA
0.0 year-end
48 matches · 16W–32L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Barbara sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Barbara is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Barbara has been 3.5 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Barbara has gone from the 76th to the 38th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 42.1% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 49.1% of games
8.0
25%
3W–9L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history48 matches
L
Debbie Montgomery / Katharine McKee
2022-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sara Kuhl
+0.060better than expected — took 37% of games against 19% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Heller
+0.043better than expected — took 25% of games against 18% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Madalena McAllen / Elaine McCall
2022-03-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pauline Lane
−0.016below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2022-02-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Liner
−0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-02-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Rea
−0.016below expectation — took 43% of games against 51% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-02-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Wallace
−0.057below expectation — took 8% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2022-01-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Liner
+0.019better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-01-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fran Joy
−0.013below expectation — took 41% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2021-10-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Rea
+0.009about as expected — took 59% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Anne Boyer / Renee Bibeault
2021-10-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carrie Wallace
−0.063below expectation — took 8% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2021-09-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Traci Huffer
+0.013about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
Andrea Newton / Sarah Wigginschamps
2021-09-18 · #3 Doubles · with Sue Cooper
−0.008below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.