Search

Elaine McCall

Sammamish, WA
3.5C year-end 2024
30 matches · 16W–14L · seasons 20192024
Where Elaine sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Elaine is one of 1702 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 68% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Elaine has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Elaine has gone from the 17th to the 60th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 49.9% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history30 matches
W
2024-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Antonette Wood
0.033below expectation — took 50% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Antonette Wood
0.011about as expected — took 55% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Lisa Lydon / Elizabeth Kain
2024-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Paborsky
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Mary Sheryll Tan / Annabelle Lucena
2024-02-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Hollyhead
0.009about as expected — took 41% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-01-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Antonette Wood
+0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-01-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annette Kempf
+0.015better than expected — took 57% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2023-10-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Richards
0.001about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2023-10-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Bastian
+0.051better than expected — took 67% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-09-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Richards
+0.027better than expected — took 52% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-03-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Bastian
0.033below expectation — took 48% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Tina Zakahi / Hien Nguyen
2023-03-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annie Johnson
0.009about as expected — took 41% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2023-02-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Huzar
0.068below expectation — took 14% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.