Search

Lisa Edlin

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2024
54 matches · 25W–29L · seasons 20192024
Where Lisa sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Lisa is one of 1627 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 67% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lisa has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.5201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Lisa has gone from the 31st to the 8th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
40.5%
17W–25L · 46.8% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 55.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history54 matches
L
Antonette Wood / Elaine McCall
2024-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becca Tessin
+0.039better than expected — took 50% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia King Hately
+0.004about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Lisa Lydon / Terriko Somers
2024-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy La Cava
0.012below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with J Weed
+0.032better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2023-03-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Ancinas
0.047below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2023-02-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Ancinas
+0.012about as expected — took 48% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-02-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Reguera
0.045below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-01-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Shearer - *
+0.035better than expected — took 62% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2023-01-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Bisyak
0.041below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Susan Walker / Bonnie Currey
2022-11-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Blume
0.028below expectation — took 61% of games against 68% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2022-10-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Whitfield
+0.004about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2022-10-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kanjamat Mullally
0.031below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.