Search

Amie Fahey

Mercer Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
83 matches · 50W–33L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.57
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
18%
down to 3.5
82%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 11% down · 89% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.60. Higher than today’s 3.57 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 4.0
37 of 45
WA · 4.0
604 of 782

Amie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Amie has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Amie has gone from the 49th to the 88th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
67.4%
31W–15L · 55.6% of games
4.0
40%
4W–6L · 48% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Carson
0.037below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jillian Hagstrom
+0.010about as expected — took 42% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Carson
0.022below expectation — took 38% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Carson
+0.050better than expected — took 60% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonal Nyati
0.009below expectation — took 38% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Emiko Way / Kelly Cagle
2026-01-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janelle Stewart
+0.004about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-01-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Hawkins
0.004about as expected — took 59% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Brick
+0.010about as expected — took 45% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Govier
+0.022better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leigh Perks
+0.009better than expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-08-25 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth Carson
+0.009better than expected — took 53% of games against 47% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-08-24 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth Carson
+0.018better than expected — took 56% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.