← Search

Amie Fahey

Mercer Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 50W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amie Fahey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-06-17 · Sun & Fun · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-10 · Sun & Fun · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jillian Hagstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · MI-Holtzclaw · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-28 · MI-Holtzclaw · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-21 · MI-Brick · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonal Nyati
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-01-18 · MI-Brick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janelle Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-01-09 · MI-Brick · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-03-15 · MI-Team Thuvier · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Brick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-03-08 · MI-Team Thuvier · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Govier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-02-22 · MI-Team Thuvier · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leigh Perks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-08-25 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth Carson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-08-24 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth Carson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
67.4%
31W–15L · 55.6% of games
4.0
40%
4W–6L · 48% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
13 matches
#1 Singles
8%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer