Teams

Sun & Fun

2026 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-23vs Shot SistersLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Carson / Paula Holtzclaw vs Sun Chaney / Natalie Pryde6-7, 1-6
2026-07-20vs AMG PetronasLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Carson / Jill Hawkins vs Sydney Bloch / Sarah Chamberlain3-6, 1-6
2026-06-24vs Double Trouble - RosauerWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Hawkins / Paula Holtzclaw vs Heidi Scalzo / Dana Skotdal6-1, 6-4
2026-06-23vs Seventy percentLost 01
L#1 DoublesJillian Hagstrom / Paula Holtzclaw vs Jiarui Ge / Liying Hou6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-17vs The OutlawsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmie Fahey / Elizabeth Carson vs Gini Bouche / Sally Ferrin3-6, 0-6
2026-06-10vs Desert Friends-SkorupaLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmie Fahey / Jillian Hagstrom vs Kimberly Skorupa / Mistie Iseman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Paula Holtzclaw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Amie Fahey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Jill Hawkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Elizabeth Carson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Jillian Hagstrom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jillian Hagstrom + Amie Fahey5355% games+5.3% vs expected
Jillian Hagstrom + Elizabeth Carson10364% games+4.8% vs expected
Amie Fahey + Elizabeth Carson10557% games+2.8% vs expected
Paula Holtzclaw + Jill Hawkins23760% games+1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Paula Holtzclaw
51W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Amie Fahey
50W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Jill Hawkins
49W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Elizabeth Carson
58W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Jillian Hagstrom
59W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.