← Search

Jillian Hagstrom

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 59W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jillian Hagstrom to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-06-23 · Sun & Fun · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Holtzclaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · Sun & Fun · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amie Fahey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-28 · MI-Flume · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-16 · MI-Holtzclaw · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nina Menon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-14 · MI-Flume · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Flume
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-03 · MI-Holtzclaw · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Holtzclaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · MI-Holtzclaw · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-09 · MI-Flume · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-02-22 · MI-Carson/Holland · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-31 · MI-Carson/Holland · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-01-18 · MI-Carson/Holland · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-11 · MI-Carson/Holland · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.6% of games
3.5
71.9%
41W–16L · 58.4% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova