Search

Susan Bisyak

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
36 matches · 12W–24L · seasons 20192026
Where Susan sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Susan is one of 1468 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 33% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Susan has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023, 2024, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Susan has gone from the 35th to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
32.3%
10W–21L · 44.4% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history36 matches
L
2025-09-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bokgi Choi
0.034below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-09-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy La Cava
0.016below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-02-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne van Roden
0.026below expectation — took 43% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-02-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Anderson
0.049below expectation — took 29% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-01-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanne Sommerville
+0.006about as expected — took 45% of games against 43% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Sarah Nicholson
2024-03-10 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.003about as expected — took 47% of games against 50% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-01-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Anderson
+0.023about as expected — took 33% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-01-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Whitfield
+0.006about as expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-01-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanne Sommerville
0.020below expectation — took 43% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2023-01-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Anderson
+0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2023-01-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Edlin
0.031below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-03-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Battison
0.043below expectation — took 28% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.