Search

Jen Anderson

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
74 matches · 29W–45L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.71
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
135 of 144
WA · 3.0
675 of 755

Jen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jen has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 2 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jen has gone from the 54th to the 9th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 43.9% of games
3.5
34.5%
10W–19L · 40.7% of games
6.0
41.7%
10W–14L · 44.6% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history74 matches
L
Susan Tameishi / Mary Heller
2026-06-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Aleinikoff
0.046below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Katie Shaw / Emily Doden
2026-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelley Buhler
0.043below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Diane Othman / Chandra Gordon
2026-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rasa Raisys
0.010about as expected — took 42% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Eloisa Tang / Jean Dankberg
2026-04-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Aleinikoff
0.038below expectation — took 32% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Grace Drone / Seungwon Lee
2026-03-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelley Buhler
+0.030better than expected — took 57% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-10-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Stonecipher
+0.031better than expected — took 63% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Annette Kempf / Emily Bradley
2025-03-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Parrott
+0.008about as expected — took 29% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-02-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Bisyak
0.052below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Jackie Osland / Eleanor Gray
2025-01-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Battison
0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2024-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Stonecipher
+0.130better than expected — took 100% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-11-09 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Hogan
0.027below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-10-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maria Denny
+0.060better than expected — took 71% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.