Search

Emily Bradley

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
72 matches · 37W–35L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.09
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
14%
down to 3.0
86%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 9% down · 91% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.11. Higher than today’s 3.09 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
244 of 256
WA · 3.5
1127 of 1209

Emily is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emily has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Emily has gone from the 58th to the 28th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
51.7%
30W–28L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with PeiPei Sung
0.029below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Corey Golden
0.008below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chanadejh Sakchalathorn
+0.000about as expected — took 40% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Janine Sy / Donna Kim
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madalena McAllen
+0.007about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Foote
0.003about as expected — took 59% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Katie Busby / Katrina Spade
2026-04-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madalena McAllen
0.003about as expected — took 48% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 5-6
L
2026-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Ryan
0.024below expectation — took 44% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Ryan
+0.028better than expected — took 56% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 4-4
L
2026-01-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Ryan
0.016below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Heather Waters / Michelle Calquhoun
2026-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Hollyhead
+0.049better than expected — took 60% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Reagan Wiltfong / Naoko Umeda
2025-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marni Klein
+0.002about as expected — took 38% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Corey Golden
0.053below expectation — took 20% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.