← Search

Todd Seneker

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 51W–30L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Todd Seneker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
W
2026-07-05 · MI-Weekend Warriors-Perret · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Una Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-27 · MI-Weekend Warriors-Perret · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janine Perret mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-19 · MI-Weekend Warriors-Perret · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janine Perret mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · MI-Selby · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlie Hsu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-24 · MI-Selby · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Fauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-28 · MI-Selby · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Fauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · with Michael Fauser championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-03-07 · MI-Yetman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Dickinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-01 · MI-Yetman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Fauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-21 · MI-Yetman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Fauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-02-07 · MI-Yetman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Fauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-01-17 · MI-Yetman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Fauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
63.2%
36W–21L · 55% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 48.8% of games
7.0mixed
100%
9W–0L · 61.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova