Search

Jean Dankberg

Sammamish, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
58 matches · 21W–37L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Sammamish · 3.0
33 of 38
WA · 3.0
877 of 1107

Jean is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jean has been a steady 3.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

2.53.0201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jean has gone from the 19th to the 33rd percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
44.4%
12W–15L · 46.5% of games
6.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 45.2% of games
6.0mixed
20%
4W–16L · 35.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Michele Rasmussen
0.024below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Mary Elliott / Andrea Haines
2026-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Whittier
+0.028better than expected — took 53% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eloisa Tang
+0.048better than expected — took 68% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Galen Sherlock / Julie Kestle-Smith
2026-03-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Bode
+0.022better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Day
+0.026better than expected — took 65% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Day
0.031below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Brenna Loury / Hector Hernandezmixed
2025-09-07 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mandar Pophali
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-09-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Day
0.012below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Marnie Bretz / Julianna Hofmann
2025-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Day
+0.027better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Bekah Burdick / Alison Etter
2025-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Day
0.025below expectation — took 41% of games against 53% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Missi Huff / Bethlyn Whitney
2025-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Day
0.029below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Michelle Behar / Lisa Mohanty
2025-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Day
+0.013better than expected — took 65% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.