Search

Elizabeth Amick

Mill Creek, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
43 matches · 20W–23L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.68
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mill Creek · 3.0
13 of 14
WA · 3.0
1003 of 1107

Elizabeth is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Elizabeth has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Elizabeth has gone from the 31st to the 8th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
51.4%
18W–17L · 52.4% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history43 matches
L
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Senthil Kumar Muthu
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Christie Cabrera / David Zhaomixed
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Ou
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Alice Lee / Mike Cadelagomixed
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Varun Nagpal
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Keiko Aikawa / Iva Naffziger
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ng
0.041below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yun Ling
+0.015about as expected — took 40% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Elizabeth Alaniz / Pondra Perkins
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Iris Cai
0.008about as expected — took 42% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
Jennifer Longtin / Liv Olson
2026-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Iris Cai
+0.027better than expected — took 60% of games against 47% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Collins
0.024below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Li Qin / Mengye Guo
2026-02-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Catzoela
0.035below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirsten Daniels
+0.024better than expected — took 46% of games against 37% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirsten Daniels
+0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Chris Gonzales / Rachel Malen
2024-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Lavitt
0.045below expectation — took 37% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.