Search

Sinead ODonovan

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
101 matches · 54W–47L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.95
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
73%
stay 3.0
27%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 93% stay · 7% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.88. Lower than today’s 2.95 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
76 of 144
WA · 3.0
338 of 755

Sinead is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sinead has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Sinead has gone from the 39th to the 55th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
67.3%
37W–18L · 56.8% of games
3.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 52% of games
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 41.9% of games
7.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history101 matches
W
Marie Wang
2026-05-31 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.054below expectation — took 41% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
Elizabeth Amick / Yun Ling
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suanty Kaghan
0.018about as expected — took 60% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suanty Kaghan
0.056below expectation — took 47% of games against 66% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Aasa Holmgren / Ruth Chan
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Wilke
+0.009better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Nely Koralska
2026-01-09 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.015below expectation — took 48% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-06-23 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.009about as expected — took 46% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
Ellie Hoffman
2025-05-25 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.074below expectation — took 39% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
Eriko Yamaguchi
2025-05-23 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.037better than expected — took 41% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-05-18 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.019below expectation — took 43% of games against 52% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Carol Tan
2025-05-09 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.031better than expected — took 100% of games against 71% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Erin Vikstrom
2025-05-04 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.053better than expected — took 92% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Helen Wang
2025-05-04 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.054better than expected — took 71% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.